---

Kendari Election Commission, as the Respondent in the case of dispute the results of elections of regional heads 53/PHPU.DX/2012 with the case number and submit answers 54/PHPU.DX/2012 proof at trial on Monday (30/7) afternoon, at room Court hearing. In addition, the judges also heard the testimony of the witnesses presented by the Applicant.

 

In response, the Respondent denied all arguments of the Petitioners. In addition, Respondent's attorney, Abdul Rahman, said that his company also filed a demurrer to the petition. "The application has been overdue," he said.

 

Not only that, he said the petition was wrong object. "What exactly is the Electoral Commission Decision concerning the determination of the results ofTurkey, not a news event (being applied for, pen)," he said.

 

Abdul Rahman also questioned the merger of the principal case made ​​by the Petitioners. "It was not known in FMD (Regulation of theConstitutional Court)," he said.

 

In the principal case, according to him, the Petitioner did not spell out clearly how the difference in the sound in question. This is because the applicant did not explain in detail, concrete, and complete the stage where the differences occur recapitulation results. "Elaboration of a violation of structured, systematic, massive and it does not exist."

 

"Respondent has done in stages from the KPPS (Group Voting Committee), PPK (District Selection Committee), until the City Commission," said Abdul Rahman.

 

The witnesses presented by the applicant, explained some of the violations and irregularities that occurred during the General Election. Violations are including the relevant Electoral List, the mobilization of civil servants, money politics, to the intimidation of residents. (Dodi / mh/Yazid.tr)

---